Aiming for a fair voting system

Public.icon

"Let's compare various voting mechanisms"

In this model, proposed proposals must be supported by the community and enter a grace period where "voters can withdraw their support from the vote" after receiving majority approval. If sufficient support is not obtained at this stage, the proposal will be discarded.

Pros: Can deal with the risk of the majority having an advantage over the minority

Cons: The voting process is long and not feasible in all DAOs

Voters' "conviction" increases as they cast long-term votes for a proposal (i.e., the longer they lock their tokens), and when a certain number of affirmative votes are obtained for the proposal, it is approved.

Pros: Does not require a majority vote to approve a proposal, so it can prevent people with strong interests or opinions from suppressing the preferences of minorities. Also, token holders can focus on proposals that they consider most important to themselves, so there is no need to reach consensus on specific proposals.

So as long as you stake for a long time, it's okay?

Cons: It may not be very effective for decision-making that requires urgent action because it may take a long time to reach a conclusion.